Also make _data_for_SPF and _data_for_TXT the same method.

Proposed google cloud provider for #23

This implements it transparently at Record level. Providers that need things to
be chunked (seems to just be Route53 an Dyn) switch to use `chunked_values`, but
everything else can stick with `values`. I've run through each provider I have
access to verifying that things operate as expected/required. OVH and Azure are
untested.

`Included` and `Excluded` can be used to filter records for one or more specific provider(s). This can be extremely useful when certain record types are not supported by a provider and you want only that provider to receive an alternative record.

See also: https://github.com/github/octodns/issues/26

Seem to be pretty inconsistently implemented/validated across providers so
just shrug and move on.

Before, 1-2k record took ~10s and more than that was just painful, 5k took
forever. This records things to keep a dict of nodes with a set of records so
that we can quickly "jump" to the point we're looking for without having to
search. 10k records now takes ~5s.

Support replace=True in zone.add_record

- unrecognized wording for invalid values

- punting on service, regex & replacement validation for now
- clean up MX a smidge